Good! But you see, if to stop upon what is a promise or a generic ideal, is to like, I do not know, never learn how the computer really works but to keep doing coding, in particular on a professional level. Hey, nice! Y'know, if to take that certain variables or definitions have been made here, it is hilarious to hesitate for a while on what do you actually mean by "free" - jobless? - or 'freedom' for an individual, then, freedom for everyone? Who is everyone? It is easy to use such words, but for me, trying to understand, it is actually very confusing. This is freedom for elite, and debt prison for the rest (for those who don't own the means of production). It also helps top managers of big companies be free. Originally posted by hell🅞world:Don't confuse the terms "open source" and "free software" (as comrade Richard Stallman said). But this is not the kind of freedom the open source talks about, right? But hey, why? Maybe they just want a different kind of spoon or a different table, then let the spice flow? Maybe it is just upside down? It grants a way in what otherwise, in the worst case, could turn into a phenomenon known as systemic violence, which the poverty suffers most. Money takes away one of the basic existential fears, the fear of survival with resourcefulness. Money grants freedom within economically bound systemic frames. But then I thought about it and concluded it does make sense. This is interesting, because money is more often associated with power, in our economically focused world. Then it came out I will be having more money in the game, granting me more possibilities. I have visited an entity with the game character - early on the game - which promised the character to be granted one of the three merits of choice: power, health or freedom? Perhaps upon the situational bias, the choice was freedom.
Now, I have been playing a web browser game called Space Lich Omega. In the open source world, there is the weight of the notion of freedom.
0 kommentar(er)
